[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080207122404.GA8195@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:24:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH], issue EOI to APIC prior to calling crash_kexec in
die_nmi path
* Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> Ingo noted a few posts down the nmi_exit doesn't actually write to the
> APIC EOI register, so yeah, I agree, its bogus (and I apologize, I
> should have checked that more carefully). Nevertheless, this patch
> consistently allowed a hangning machine to boot through an Nmi lockup.
> So I'm forced to wonder whats going on then that this patch helps
> with. perhaps its a just a very fragile timing issue, I'll need to
> look more closely.
try a dummy iret, something like:
asm volatile ("pushf; push $1f; iret; 1: \n");
to get the CPU out of its 'nested NMI' state. (totally untested)
the idea is to push down an iret frame to the kernel stack that will
just jump to the next instruction and gets it out of the NMI nesting.
Note: interrupts will/must still be disabled, despite the iret. (the
ordering of the pushes might be wrong, we might need more than that for
a valid iret, etc. etc.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists