linux-kernel - Re: [patch 07/10] unprivileged mounts: add sysctl tunable for "safe" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:24:19 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
	serue@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 07/10] unprivileged mounts: add sysctl tunable for
	"safe" property

> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:36:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> > 
> > Add the following:
> > 
> >   /proc/sys/fs/types/${FS_TYPE}/usermount_safe
> > 
> 
> 
> There is  /proc/fs/<type>/ already. Since it is file system specific
> shouldn't it go there ?

The problem is exactly that it's filesystem specific, each filesystem
creates it's own stuff there.

Also we have a rule tp not create new things under /proc.  Things
should either go into /sys or into /proc/sys.  And I think a sysctl is
more appropriate for this than something under /sys.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/