linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:01:08 +1030
From:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

Alan Cox wrote:
>> previous statements which seemed to say, "you've spoken to numerous
>>     
>
> Please don't use "seemed to say" and then quote words I've never said.
> That's misleading, rude and also awful language style.

No, it's called, "paraphrasing," and it's quite normal in a
conversation.  You say something, I tell you what I think you said, you
refine your language, and the process continues until we're happy that a
semantic consensus has been reached.  In that spirit, should I now
understand that what you meant is that *you* *think* that kernel modules
must be released under GPL.  Should I accept that you didn't mean that
numerous lawyers had told you that this was factually so?

Of course, this begs the question of why there would be a
MODULE_LICENSE("proprietary").  You may hold beliefs as understood
above, but it seems guaranteed that the opinions of those who count are
divided.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/