[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080207210254.245A94C9B7A@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:02:54 -0600 (CST)
From: shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [git pull] jfs update
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shaggy/jfs-2.6.git for-linus
This will update the following files:
fs/jfs/file.c | 5 ++++-
fs/jfs/ioctl.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
fs/jfs/jfs_dinode.h | 2 ++
fs/jfs/jfs_inode.h | 4 ++--
fs/jfs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
through these ChangeSets:
Commit: ef1fc2f01e02951a0d8520ec3aa0b38606d74b55
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:02:02 -0600
BKL-removal: Implement a compat_ioctl handler for JFS
The ioctls were already compatible except for the actual values so this
was fairly easy to do.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Commit: baab81fa518ecfac597402b462631f5593926623
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:58:51 -0600
BKL-removal: Use unlocked_ioctl for jfs
Convert jfs_ioctl over to not use the BKL. The only potential race
I could see was with two ioctls in parallel changing the flags
and losing the updates. Use the i_mutex to protect against this.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists