[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47AB8F63.4020002@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:08:19 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce large do_mount stack usage with noinlines
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:11:38 -0600
> Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> /*
>> * recursively change the type of the mountpoint.
>> + * noinline this do_mount helper to save do_mount stack space.
>> */
>> -static int do_change_type(struct nameidata *nd, int flag)
>> +static noinline int do_change_type(struct nameidata *nd, int flag)
>
> What we could do here is defined a new noinline_because_of_stack_suckiness
> and use that.
Something like:
Index: linux-2.6.24-mm1/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-mm1.orig/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-mm1/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
@@ -53,3 +53,9 @@
#define noinline __attribute__((noinline))
#define __attribute_const__ __attribute__((__const__))
#define __maybe_unused __attribute__((unused))
+
+/*
+ * When gcc inlines multiple functions into a parent function,
+ * the stack space used sometimes increases excessively...
+ */
+#define noinline_stackspace noinline
?
I couldn't think of a great name for it. There are several noinline
users throughout the kernel with stackspace related comments, so if
desired, I could sprinkle this around. I'm not very pleased with it
aesthetically though. :)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists