[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080208081226.GH9730@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:12:26 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan.Brunelle@...com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, dgc@....com
Subject: Re: IO queuing and complete affinity with threads (was Re: [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity)
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > And if you don't?
>
> Well if you don't ask for anything, you wont get anything :-)
> As I mentioned, the patch is a playing ground for trying various setups.
> Everything defaults to 'do as usual', set options to setup certain test
> scenarios.
I mean if you don't know the completing CPU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists