[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080208102347.GD21852@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:23:47 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <openembedded@...rwu.biz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm/Kconfig: Make UIO available on ARM architecture
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:18:31AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> But still, it's HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS which we want to depend on, not a
> newly-invented HAVE_MTD. And there are other places we really ought to
> be depending on HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too.
That would be misleading though - !CPU_CP15_MMU does not mean we support
unaligned accesses. It means that we may have no way to support fixing
up unaligned accesses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists