[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080208145911.GA4257@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:59:11 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Takashi Sato <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext3 freeze feature
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:26:57AM -0500, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> You may as well make the common ioctl the same as the XFS version,
> both by number and parameters, so that applications which already
> understand the XFS ioctl will work on other filesystems.
Yes. In facy you should be able to lift the implementations of
XFS_IOC_FREEZE and XFS_IOC_THAW to generic code, there's nothing
XFS-specific in there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists