[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ACA250.1010404@steeleye.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:41:20 -0500
From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...eleye.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NBD: make nbd default to deadline I/O scheduler
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:33:41 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:47:42 -0500 Paul Clements wrote:
>>
>>> There have been numerous reports of problems with nbd and cfq. Deadline
>>> gives better performance for nbd, anyway, so let's use it by default.
>
> Please define "problems". If it's just "slowness" then we can live with
> that, but I'd hope that Jens is aware and that it's understood.
>
> It it's "hangs" or "oopses" then we panic.
The two problems I have experienced (which may already be fixed):
1) nbd hangs with cfq on RHEL 5 (2.6.18) -- this may well have been fixed
There's a similar debian bug that has been filed as well:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447638
2) nbd performs about 10% better (the last time I tested) with deadline
vs. cfq (the overhead of cfq doesn't provide much advantage to nbd [not
being a real disk], and you end up going through the I/O scheduler on
the nbd server anyway, so it makes sense that deadline is better with nbd)
There have been posts to nbd-general mailing list about problems with
cfq and nbd also.
--
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists