[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ACB0AA.8050103@davidnewall.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:12:34 +1030
From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
Greg KH wrote:
> A "driver" is not an "application" as you tried to reference in your
> prior quotes.
I think your treating what the learned Professors said to literally.
> It is a tiny portion of the whole kernel,
The Copyright Act draws no such a distinction.
> and as such,
> does fall under the derivative works portion when it is run within the
> Linux kernel.
>
Section 0 of GPL: The act of running the Program is not restricted.
> Again, see the Samba decisions that have happened in the past when
> companies have tried to add modules to it that are not under the GPL.
> They have failed every single time, so there is a lot of precedent for
> this kind of thing.
>
I'd like to, but I've searched and searched and can't find them. Some
pointers, maybe a search term, would be useful.
> This is going to be my last response on this thread,
Good idea. I've spent too much time on this already, so I think I'll
join you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists