[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080208202219.GE31984@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:22:19 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] NFSD: Use "depends on" for PROC_FS dependency
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Recently a reverse dependency was added to fs/Kconfig to ensure that
> PROC_FS was enabled if NFSD_V4 was enabled.
>
> There is a guideline in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt that
> states "In general use select only for non-visible symbols (no prompts
> anywhere) and for symbols with no dependencies."
>
> A quick grep around other Kconfig files reveals that no entry currently
> uses "select PROC_FS" -- every one uses "depends on". Thus CONFIG_NFSD_V4
> should use "depends on PROC_FS" as well.
>
> For SUNRPC_GSS, it's a little more complex. Other entries can "select"
> SUNRPC_GSS, as it is non-visible. However, the guideline suggests an
> entry can't "select" it if it has a dependency (such as PROC_FS).
> So, we add forward dependencies on PROC_FS to RPCSEC_GSS_FOO instead.
>
> XXX: Both CONFIG_NFSV4 and CONFIG_NFSD_V4 select RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5, which is
> visible, which kconfig-language.txt also frowns upon. The intent was to
> enable at least one GSS mechanism if V4 was enabled. Perhaps we should
> make SUNRPC_GSS visible, and make the NFSv4 options visible only if
> SUNRPC_GSS is enabled.
This is better than what we had - so OK.
We can revisit when kconfig gets more features added to support
such configurations.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists