[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ACC381.9070601@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:02:57 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2008-02-08 17:23:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>> Hi,
>>
>>>>> I really need the entry point to be at offset 0, so
>>>>> that I can get
>>>>> pointers to my data. I could not figure out how to do
>>>>> it any other
>>>>> way. And if 0 is taken, I thought I'd put header at the
>>>>> end.
>>>>>
>>>> Why not just put the structure at 0, and put pointers in
>>>> the structure to everything else you need?
>>> segments:offsets rear its ugly head here. I need %ds to point to my
>>> data, and the way to do it is copy it from %cs; that needs start to be
>>> at 0.
>> Hm, why exactly is that necessay?
>
> It is not _neccessary_. Try to come up with another method that gets
> relocations right. I could not :-(.
>
> (Actually, putting table at the offset 0 and short jump at beggining
> of the table would probably do the trick. But that still keeps code at
> offset 0 :-).
> Pavel
Why not just put a pointer to the start of the code in the table, and
make an indirect call to it?
Where is this code?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists