Message-ID: <47ACD9BA.5040608@suse.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:37:46 -0500
From:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:464!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Our old friend kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:464! is back, this
>>> time from mainline. I can't reproduce with 2.6.24-final, but I can with
>>> a git snapshot from a few days ago. I'm doing a git bisect run now, but
>>> it's rather time consuming, so I thought I'd pass this on in the interim.
>>>
>>> I can reproduce this just by doing "cat /dev/snapshot".
>>>
>>> Working output looks like:
>>> swsusp: Marking nosave pages: 000000000009f000 - 0000000000100000
>>> swsusp: Marking nosave pages: 00000000f7ff0000 - 0000000100000000
>>> swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created
>>> swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps freed
>> root@amd:~# cat /dev/snapshot
>> cat: /dev/snapshot: No data available
>> root@amd:~# 
>>
>> ...on less than two days old 2.6.25-rc0-git. Rafael, do you have any
>> ideas what may break?
> 
> No idea and I can't reproduce it.
> 
> Plus the trace looks bogus, as there are no "swsusp: ..." messages in the
> mainline any more.

The git version from two days ago did. :)

I just git pulled and built and got the same BUG.

Here are the nosave registration messages:
PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000f7ff0000 - 00000000f7fff000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000f7fff000 - 00000000f8000000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000f8000000 - 00000000ff780000
PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000ff780000 - 0000000100000000

And the old swsusp messages match those ranges, just coalesced into two
ranges.

Reassembling the zones from /proc/zoneinfo yields:
Node 0, zone DMA	start_pfn: 0, spanned 4096
			(0x0-0x1000)
Node 0, zone DMA32	start_pfn: 4096, spanned 1011696
			(0x1000-0xf7ff0)
Node 1, zone Normal	start_pfn: 1048576, spanned 1048576
			(0x100000-200000)

The pfn it's searching for is 0xf7ff0, which will end up hitting this in
memory_bm_find_bit:
while (pfn < zone_bm->start_pfn || pfn >= zone_bm->end_pfn) {
	zone_bm = zone_bm->next;
	BUG_ON(!zone_bm)
}

Should that be pfn > zone_bm->end_pfn, or is end_pfn non-inclusive?

- -Jeff

Here's the updated oops, which doesn't look any different:

- ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:464!
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
CPU 1
Modules linked in: ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_nodemanager configfs
autofs4 sunrpc iptable_filter ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables
x_tables ipv6 af_packet loop dm_mod sbp2 ohci1394 ieee1394 k8temp
amd_rng tg3 i2c_amd8111 hwmon i2c_amd756 floppy shpchp rtc_cmos rtc_core
rtc_lib sr_mod i2c_core cdrom parport_pc parport pci_hotplug serio_raw
button sg ohci_hcd sd_mod usbcore edd ext3 mbcache jbd fan sata_sil
pata_amd libata scsi_mod thermal processor
Pid: 3165, comm: cat Not tainted 2.6.24-vanilla #20
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80254c4c>]  [<ffffffff80254c4c>]
memory_bm_find_bit+0x20/0x78
RSP: 0018:ffff8100379bfd78  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff810000003480 RCX: ffff8100379bfd8c
RDX: ffff8100379bfd80 RSI: 00000000000f7ff0 RDI: ffff81003793e5c0
RBP: 00000000000f7ff0 R08: ffff8100379bfd80 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff81003793e5c0
R13: ffff81003783f118 R14: ffff81003783f118 R15: ffff8100f603e380
FS:  00007f753cff06f0(0000) GS:ffff8100f767ec40(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007f753cb47c30 CR3: 00000000f61fc000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process cat (pid: 3165, threadinfo ffff8100379be000, task ffff8100378f0640)
Stack:  ffffffff80254cb5 ffff810037837018 0000003ff603e380 ffffffff8025641f
 ffff8100f603e380 0000000000000000 ffff81003783f118 ffffffff80257016
 ffff8100f777fe40 ffffffff8040dbca ffffffff80451aa0 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff80254cb5>] ? memory_bm_set_bit+0x11/0x20
 [<ffffffff8025641f>] ? create_basic_memory_bitmaps+0x134/0x139
 [<ffffffff80257016>] ? snapshot_open+0x58/0x13f
 [<ffffffff8040dbca>] ? mutex_lock+0xd/0x1e
 [<ffffffff8035fb76>] ? misc_open+0x13e/0x1b2
 [<ffffffff80294459>] ? chrdev_open+0x150/0x174
 [<ffffffff8029c495>] ? open_namei+0x2d0/0x653
 [<ffffffff80294309>] ? chrdev_open+0x0/0x174
 [<ffffffff802906dc>] ? __dentry_open+0xeb/0x1be
 [<ffffffff80290866>] ? do_filp_open+0x2d/0x3d
 [<ffffffff8029055b>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x7f/0x10e
 [<ffffffff802908bc>] ? do_sys_open+0x46/0xc3
 [<ffffffff8020befb>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80


Code: 00 3d 4f 80 e9 74 8f 1b 00 90 90 48 8b 47 10 49 89 d0 48 3b 70 08
72 06 48 3b 70 10 72 21 48 8b 07 eb 0c 48 8b 00 48 85 c0 75 04 <0f> 0b
eb fe 48 3b 70 08 72 ee 48 3b 70 10 73 e8 48 89 47 10 48
RIP  [<ffffffff80254c4c>] memory_bm_find_bit+0x20/0x78
 RSP <ffff8100379bfd78>
- ---[ end trace 5aadb6f82638eb8d ]---


- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHrNm6LPWxlyuTD7IRAtL5AJ4hiKgxkwc8mlrGxIKfyIebTit5LwCcDDeF
f7iGfoSBqyY7FgmnC3f0898=
=X6Jq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists