linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: fix alpha, ia64 and ppc64 compile failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:46:15 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc:	rth@...ddle.net, tony.luck@...el.com, anton@...ba.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, bunk@...nel.org, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: fix alpha, ia64 and ppc64 compile failures

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:33:41 +0300
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru> wrote:

> On alpha, ia64 and ppc64 only relocations to local data can go into
> read-only sections. The vast majority of module parameters use the global
> generic param_set_*/param_get_* functions, so the 'const' attribute for
> struct kernel_param is not only useless, but it also causes compile
> failures due to 'section type conflict' in those rare cases where
> param_set/get are local functions.
> 
> This fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8964
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> ---
>  include/linux/moduleparam.h |   12 +++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> index 8126e55..ec62438 100644
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,16 @@ struct kparam_array
>  	void *elem;
>  };
>  
> +/* On alpha, ia64 and ppc64 relocations to global data cannot go into
> +   read-only sections (which is part of respective UNIX ABI on these
> +   platforms). So 'const' makes no sense and even causes compile failures
> +   with some compilers. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ALPHA) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> +#define __moduleparam_const
> +#else
> +#define __moduleparam_const const
> +#endif
> +
>  /* This is the fundamental function for registering boot/module
>     parameters.  perm sets the visibility in sysfs: 000 means it's
>     not there, read bits mean it's readable, write bits mean it's
> @@ -71,7 +81,7 @@ struct kparam_array
>  	static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) =	\
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2));	\
>  	static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name;		\
> -	static struct kernel_param const __param_##name			\
> +	static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name	\
>  	__used								\
>      __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
>  	= { __param_str_##name, perm, set, get, { arg } }

I think it would have been better to define a new CONFIG_MODULEPARAM_CONST
for those three archictures, rather than muckying up the code like this.

But hey, I get to close a bugzilla report - I'm doing that amlonst monthly
now.  Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/