[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080208144615.9f2fc593.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:46:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: rth@...ddle.net, tony.luck@...el.com, anton@...ba.org,
paulus@...ba.org, bunk@...nel.org, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] moduleparam: fix alpha, ia64 and ppc64 compile failures
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:33:41 +0300
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru> wrote:
> On alpha, ia64 and ppc64 only relocations to local data can go into
> read-only sections. The vast majority of module parameters use the global
> generic param_set_*/param_get_* functions, so the 'const' attribute for
> struct kernel_param is not only useless, but it also causes compile
> failures due to 'section type conflict' in those rare cases where
> param_set/get are local functions.
>
> This fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8964
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> ---
> include/linux/moduleparam.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> index 8126e55..ec62438 100644
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,16 @@ struct kparam_array
> void *elem;
> };
>
> +/* On alpha, ia64 and ppc64 relocations to global data cannot go into
> + read-only sections (which is part of respective UNIX ABI on these
> + platforms). So 'const' makes no sense and even causes compile failures
> + with some compilers. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ALPHA) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> +#define __moduleparam_const
> +#else
> +#define __moduleparam_const const
> +#endif
> +
> /* This is the fundamental function for registering boot/module
> parameters. perm sets the visibility in sysfs: 000 means it's
> not there, read bits mean it's readable, write bits mean it's
> @@ -71,7 +81,7 @@ struct kparam_array
> static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \
> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)); \
> static const char __param_str_##name[] = prefix #name; \
> - static struct kernel_param const __param_##name \
> + static struct kernel_param __moduleparam_const __param_##name \
> __used \
> __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
> = { __param_str_##name, perm, set, get, { arg } }
I think it would have been better to define a new CONFIG_MODULEPARAM_CONST
for those three archictures, rather than muckying up the code like this.
But hey, I get to close a bugzilla report - I'm doing that amlonst monthly
now. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists