[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802091511300.3378@scrub.home>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:13:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] correct inconsistent ntp interval/tick_length usage
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Only now I noticed that the first patch had been merged without any
> > further question. :-(
> > What point is there in reviewing patches, if everything is merged anyway. :-(
> >
>
> oops, mistake, sorry. There's plenty of time to fix it though.
It has been signed off by both Ingo and Thomas and neither noticed
anything? This makes me very afraid of the merging process...
bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists