[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ADB836.9030404@web.de>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:27:02 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To: jason.wessel@...driver.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] kgdb: core API and gdb protocol handler
jason.wessel@...driver.com wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/kgdb.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +/*
> + * include/asm-generic/kgdb.h
> + *
> + * This provides the assembly level information so that KGDB can provide
> + * a GDB that has been patched with enough information to know to stop
> + * trying to unwind the function.
> + *
> + * Author: Tom Rini <trini@...nel.crashing.org>
> + *
> + * 2005 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc.
> + * 2006 (c) Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc.
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_KGDB_H__
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_KGDB_H__
> +
> +struct pt_regs;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
Hmm, I just realized that I didn't really looked at the arch interface
in details yet. Now it appears a bit inconsistent to me in its way to
tell "this arch supports that". Something in include/asm-generic that
starts with #ifdef CONFIG_X86 looks ugly, to begin with.
...
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_INFO
Then we have this KGDB_ARCH_HAS thing here, the second way to control
arch-dependent stuff.
...
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/kgdb.h
...
> +struct kgdb_arch {
> + unsigned char gdb_bpt_instr[BREAK_INSTR_SIZE];
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned shadowth;
> +
> + int (*set_breakpoint)(unsigned long, char *);
> + int (*remove_breakpoint)(unsigned long, char *);
> + int (*set_hw_breakpoint)(unsigned long, int, enum kgdb_bptype);
> + int (*remove_hw_breakpoint)(unsigned long, int, enum kgdb_bptype);
> + void (*remove_all_hw_break)(void);
> + void (*correct_hw_break)(void);
> +};
And this is the third way. Can we consolidate this?
...
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/kgdb.c
...
> +/*
> + * Convert the memory pointed to by mem into hex, placing result in buf.
> + * Return a pointer to the last char put in buf (null). May return an error.
> + */
> +char *kgdb_mem2hex(char *mem, char *buf, int count)
As Linus remarked, still pointer-based return values while only the
error code is used by the callers (there are more of such cases in the
core).
...
> --- a/kernel/softlockup.c
> +++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
...
> @@ -52,7 +55,6 @@ static unsigned long get_timestamp(int this_cpu)
> void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> -
Probably some relic from older changes which should be killed.
Jan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (255 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists