linux-kernel - Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1202515227.1805.167.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:00:27 -0800
From:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
Cc:	ltuikov@...oo.com, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ming Zhang <blackmagic02881@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 17:42 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 12:37 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > 
> >>Is there an open iSCSI Target implementation which does NOT
> >>issue commands to sub-target devices via the SCSI mid-layer, but
> >>bypasses it completely?
> >>
> >>   Luben
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Luben,
> > 
> > I am guessing you mean futher down the stack, which I don't know this to
> > be the case.  Going futher up the layers is the design of v2.9 LIO-SE.
> > There is a diagram explaining the basic concepts from a 10,000 foot
> > level.
> > 
> > http://linux-iscsi.org/builds/user/nab/storage-engine-concept.pdf
> > 
> > Note that only traditional iSCSI target is currently implemented in v2.9
> > LIO-SE codebase in the list of target mode fabrics on left side of the
> > layout.  The API between the protocol headers that does
> > encoding/decoding target mode storage packets is probably the least
> > mature area of the LIO stack (because it has always been iSCSI looking
> > towards iSER :).  I don't know who has the most mature API between the
> > storage engine and target storage protocol for doing this between SCST
> > and STGT, I am guessing SCST because of the difference in age of the
> > projects.  Could someone be so kind to fill me in on this..?
> 
> SCST uses scsi_execute_async_fifo() function to submit commands to SCSI 
> devices in the pass-through mode. This function is slightly modified 
> version of scsi_execute_async(), which submits requests in FIFO order 
> instead of LIFO as scsi_execute_async() does (so with 
> scsi_execute_async() they are executed in the reverse order). 
> Scsi_execute_async_fifo() added as a separate patch to the kernel.

The LIO-SE PSCSI Plugin also depends on scsi_execute_async() for builds
on >= 2.6.18.  Note in the core LIO storage engine code (would be
iscsi_target_transport.c), there is no subsystem dependence logic.  The
LIO-SE API is what allows the SE plugins to remain simple and small:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35008 2008-02-02 03:25 iscsi_target_pscsi.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7537 2008-02-02 17:27 iscsi_target_pscsi.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18269 2008-02-04 02:23 iscsi_target_iblock.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6834 2008-02-04 02:25 iscsi_target_iblock.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30611 2008-02-02 03:25 iscsi_target_file.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7833 2008-02-02 17:27 iscsi_target_file.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35154 2008-02-02 04:01 iscsi_target_rd.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  9900 2008-02-02 17:27 iscsi_target_rd.h

It also means that the core LIO-SE code does not have to change when the
subsystem APIs change.  This has been important in the past for the
project, but for upstream code, probably would not make a huge
difference.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/