linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Replace nvidia timer override quirk with pci id list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:30:16 +0100
From:	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, lenb@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace nvidia timer override quirk with pci id list

Am Samstag 09 Februar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:51:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > We discussed this back then with Nvidia engineers and they stated
> > > that only NF5 would need timer overrides.
> >
> > Can I get a link which verifies your statement? I provided one which kind
> > of contradicts yours.
>
> Sorry cannot supply links to them, they were private mail. For some
> reason the Nvidia people seem to be shy to post to mailing lists.

Too bad that you cannot make them publish their infos.

>
> iirc the thread which inspired this patch (together with several
> bugs in both novell and kernel.org bugzilla) was
>
> http://marc.info/?t=116175224500001&r=1&w=2

Interesting, this was where I posted, as well...

> So you have to trust me on that -- it's a bit similar to as to I have
> to trust your not yet produced boot log and test results.

And I won't, as I reverted to my stable kernel again and thus patching it 
again (yes it was 2.6.24 with early-quirks.c from git and your patch on top) 
doesn't give more info then I already provided. Furthermore I also told you 
that because of missing nforce2 ID the practical test wasn't really 
necessary.

Just add this line to your patch:

+       QBRIDGE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NVIDIA_NFORCE2, 
nvidia_timer),

So that the quirk gets applied for nForce2, then your patch is - while still 
wrong in my eyes - not a regression anymore (for me) and thus I would take 
back my NAK(, but still not ACK it).

bye,
-- 
(°=                 =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/                 \_V

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)