linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:56:23 -0500
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are
> > no more bugs in it - this _is_ a 1:1 patch after all, so in theory the
> > worst side-effect should be build breakages due to include file
> > spaghetti. The window for this particular breakage was just 256 commits,
> > that's OK i think.
>
> Except for the breakage of all nommu architectures .. they need the
> pgtable_t as well due to the pte_fn_t type.

so why wasnt this in the original patch ?  why do no-mmu arches have
to add the pgtable_t typedefs themselves ?
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/