[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202590755.14165.11.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:59:15 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: [PATCH] make KVM selectable again
Current git for me (b1d0e4f535e10775cffde922208b49629169aeaa) doesn't
let me build KVM. In fact, I don't seem to have *ANY* kvm-related
symbols in my .config at all.
I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by putting some
comments in it. It seems to me like just putting:
config HAVE_KVM
bool
isn't letting anything come into my .config at all. I'm not sure why we
do that, and then have:
select HAVE_KVM
in arch/x86/Kconfig.
This patch just defines HAVE_KVM in the x86 Kconfig and is done with it.
Seems to work for me.
Was there some reason that it was done this way? Was it ever tested?
-- Dave
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 65a70b7..cbbf35d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ config ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX
config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
def_bool X86_64
-select HAVE_KVM
+config HAVE_KVM
+ def_bool y
config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
def_bool y
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index 41962e7..f2177ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
#
# KVM configuration
#
-config HAVE_KVM
- bool
menuconfig VIRTUALIZATION
bool "Virtualization"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists