[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080209094037.GA23418@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:40:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: davej@...emonkey.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use global TLB flushes in MTRR code
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > because it's not just an open-coded __tlb_flush_all(), it _disables PGE
> > and keeps it so while the MTRR's are changed on all CPUs_.
>
> Yes and?
your first patch was outright wrong then you declared the second one a
"cleanup" while it changes behavior: bad in my book ;-)
> > Your patch adds __flush_tlb_all() which re-enables the PGE bit in cr4,
> > see asm-x86/tlbflush.h:
> >
> > /* clear PGE */
> > write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE);
> > /* write old PGE again and flush TLBs */
> > write_cr4(cr4);
> >
> > so we'll keep PGE enabled during the MTRR setting - which changes
> > behavior.
>
> It changes behaviour in some minor ways but I don't think it makes any
> difference. PGE only influences TLB flushes (according to its
> specification) and all the TLB flushes still run with PGE disabled.
now that i pointed out the difference, your position changed to "changes
behavior in minor ways" ;-)
This is fragile code and almost nothing in the MTRR area is "minor", we
are just not touching this code unless it's really justified.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists