[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080210104709.GB10790@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:47:09 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [0/6] kgdb light
Hi Ingo.
A few comments based on the git tree pulled as of
~11:00.
We have following header files in the core part:
linux/kgdb.h
asm-generic/kgdb.h
I would expect linux/kgdb.h to contain all the common definitions
needed by an arch.
And asm-generic/kgdb.h to list everything that the arch needs to
provide to support kgdb. + anything that rely on the arch
definitions provided by the arch.
Yet linux/kgdb.h says:
+/*
+ * Functions each KGDB-supporting architecture must provide:
+ */
So I am obviously wrong here. What triggered the division
in the two header files?
Some minor specific comments:
+/**
+ * kgdb_skipexception - Bail of of KGDB when we've been triggered.
+ * @exception: Exception vector number
+ * @regs: Current &struct pt_regs.
+ *
+ * On some architectures we need to skip a breakpoint exception when
+ * it occurs after a breakpoint has been removed.
+ */
+int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+/**
+ * kgdb_post_master_code - Save error vector/code numbers.
+ * @regs: Original pt_regs.
+ * @e_vector: Original error vector.
+ * @err_code: Original error code.
+ *
+ * This is needed on architectures which support SMP and KGDB.
+ * This function is called after all the slave cpus have been put
+ * to a know spin state and the master CPU has control over KGDB.
+ */
+extern void kgdb_post_master_code(struct pt_regs *regs, int e_vector,
+ int err_code);
+
Please be consistent in use of extern.
Either drop it all over or use it all over.
+#ifndef _KGDB_H_
+#define _KGDB_H_
+
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
+
+#include <linux/serial_8250.h>
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
+#include <asm/kgdb.h>
I do not really see the point of the CONFIG_KGDB ifdef.
And if we want it then why not above the inclusion
of atomic.h?
Looking a bit closer it looks like all content from asm-generic/kgdb.h
is included in linux/kgdb.h - correct?
I assume the header file in asm-generic should have been deleted?
+ */
+void
+sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *p);
+
Make return value visible on same line as the function to be consistent in
style.
+/* Is a host GDB connected to us? */
+int kgdb_connected;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kgdb_connected);
Kernel-doc comments for EXPORTs.
+extern int kgdb_may_fault;
I searched but I could not find any places this
variable were set to anuthing else than 0 neither where it was tested.
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kgdb b/lib/Kconfig.kgdb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..00263c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kgdb
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+
+menuconfig KGDB
+ bool "KGDB: kernel debugging with remote gdb"
+ select FRAME_POINTER
+ depends on HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
+ depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ If you say Y here, it will be possible to remotely debug the
+ kernel using gdb. Documentation of kernel debugger is available
+ at http://kgdb.sourceforge.net as well as in DocBook form
+ in Documentation/DocBook/. If unsure, say N.
+
+config HAVE_ARCH_KGDB_SHADOW_INFO
+ bool
+
Please add:
config HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
bool
So we later in x86/Kconfig can do:
config X86
select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
And we can get rid of (from x86/Kconfig):
+config HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
+ def_bool y
Back to Kconfig.kgdb:
+config KGDBOC
+ tristate "KGDB: use kgdb over the serial console"
+ depends on KGDB
Can we have a more descriptive name here.
For example:
config KGDB_SERIAL_CONSOLE
It is only used in one place so there is no
specific need for such a magic short name.
I see that all my other comments were addresses - thanks.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists