[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080210195556.GA5261@homac>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:55:56 +0100
From: Holger Macht <hmacht@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com, alan@...hat.com,
jeff@...zik.org
Subject: [PATCH] libata: Forcing PIO0 mode on reset must not freeze system
Calling ap->ops->set_piomode(ap, dev) on a device/controller which got
already removed, locks the system hard. Reproducibly on an X60 attached to
a dock station containing a cdrom device with doing
$ echo 1 > /sys/devices/platform/dock.0/undock && echo 123 > /dev/sr0
This calls ata_eh_reset(...) which in turn tries to force PIO mode 0. But
the device is already gone.
Bisecting revealed the following commit as culprit:
commit cdeab1140799f09c5f728a5ff85e0bdfa5679cd2
Author: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Date: Mon Oct 29 16:41:09 2007 +0900
libata: relocate forcing PIO0 on reset
Forcing PIO0 on reset was done inside ata_bus_softreset(), which is a
bit out of place as it should be applied to all resets - hard, soft
and implementation which don't use ata_bus_softreset(). Relocate it
such that...
* For new EH, it's done in ata_eh_reset() before calling prereset.
* For old EH, it's done before calling ap->ops->phy_reset() in
ata_bus_probe().
This makes PIO0 forced after all resets. Another difference is that
reset itself is done after PIO0 is forced.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
ATTENTION! The following patch solves the problem on my system, but please
be aware that I don't really know what I'm doing because I don't have the
big picture. There's surely a better way to check if the device/controller
is still functional than calling ata_link_{online,offline}.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@...e.de>
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 4e31071..d6a7c57 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -2131,23 +2131,25 @@ int ata_eh_reset(struct ata_link *link, int classify,
ata_eh_about_to_do(link, NULL, ehc->i.action & ATA_EH_RESET_MASK);
- ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
- /* If we issue an SRST then an ATA drive (not ATAPI)
- * may change configuration and be in PIO0 timing. If
- * we do a hard reset (or are coming from power on)
- * this is true for ATA or ATAPI. Until we've set a
- * suitable controller mode we should not touch the
- * bus as we may be talking too fast.
- */
- dev->pio_mode = XFER_PIO_0;
+ if (ata_link_online(link) != ata_link_offline(link)) {
+ ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, link) {
+ /* If we issue an SRST then an ATA drive (not ATAPI)
+ * may change configuration and be in PIO0 timing. If
+ * we do a hard reset (or are coming from power on)
+ * this is true for ATA or ATAPI. Until we've set a
+ * suitable controller mode we should not touch the
+ * bus as we may be talking too fast.
+ */
+ dev->pio_mode = XFER_PIO_0;
- /* If the controller has a pio mode setup function
- * then use it to set the chipset to rights. Don't
- * touch the DMA setup as that will be dealt with when
- * configuring devices.
- */
- if (ap->ops->set_piomode)
- ap->ops->set_piomode(ap, dev);
+ /* If the controller has a pio mode setup function
+ * then use it to set the chipset to rights. Don't
+ * touch the DMA setup as that will be dealt with when
+ * configuring devices.
+ */
+ if (ap->ops->set_piomode)
+ ap->ops->set_piomode(ap, dev);
+ }
}
/* Determine which reset to use and record in ehc->i.action.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists