| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080210234722.GI5299@parisc-linux.org> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:47:23 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: dougg@...que.net, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error: Fix language abuse. On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 01:50:20PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:32:54 -0500 Douglas Gilbert <dougg@...que.net> wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > The word "illegal" has a precise dictionary meaning of "prohibited by > > > law". > > > > Also "contrary to or forbidden by official rules, regulations, etc". > > The OED I have here doesn't seem to think so, however if the words are > the ones used in the T10 documentation then I'm happy to drop the patch. Not everyone believes in the OED's definitions. I prefer Chambers (in general), which has the (online) definition: illegal adj 1 against the law; not legal. Also called unlawful. 2 not authorized by law or by specific rules which apply. ETYMOLOGY: 17c: from Latin illegalis. I believe the second definition would apply here. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists