[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080210012710.GC3589@verge.net.au>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:27:12 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipvs: Cleanup sync daemon code
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:38:11AM +0100, Sven Wegener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to get your feedback on this:
>
> - Use kthread_run instead of doing a double-fork via kernel_thread()
>
> - Return proper error codes to user-space on failures
>
> Currently ipvsadm --start-daemon with an invalid --mcast-interface will
> silently suceed. With these changes we get an appropriate "No such
> device" error.
>
> - Use wait queues for both master and backup thread
>
> Instead of doing an endless loop with sleeping for one second, we now use
> wait queues. The master sync daemon has its own wait queue and gets woken
> up when we have enough data to sent and also at a regular interval. The
> backup sync daemon sits on the wait queue of the mcast socket and gets
> woken up as soon as we have data to process.
Hi Sven,
This looks good to me, assuming that its tested and works.
A few minor things:
In sb_queue_tail() master loop is woken up if
the ip_vs_sync_count reaches 10, which seems a bit arbitary.
Perhaps its just my mail reader, but the patch seemed a bit screwy when
I saved it to a file. I this fixed the problem I was seeing using s/^ / /
Unfortuantely/Fortunately I am about to leave for a few days skiing,
so if I am quiet you will know why.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
--
Horms
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists