linux-kernel - Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47B01D47.10006@vlnb.net>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:02:47 +0300
From:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To:	ltuikov@...oo.com
CC:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>>Is there an open iSCSI Target implementation which
>>
>>does NOT
>>
>>>issue commands to sub-target devices via the SCSI
>>
>>mid-layer, but
>>
>>>bypasses it completely?
>>
>>What do you mean? To call directly low level backstorage
>>SCSI drivers 
>>queuecommand() routine? What are advantages of it?
> 
> Yes, that's what I meant.  Just curious.

What's advantage of it?

> Thanks,
>    Luben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/