linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47B07E76.9000100@tiscali.nl>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:26 +0100
From:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	kyle@...isc-linux.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	grundler@...isc-linux.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c]	pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent
 = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent?

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:23 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears
>> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here. 
>>
>> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct
> 
> No, it looks completely incorrect to me.  What makes you think a pcxl
> box has a problem with coherency?

Ok, please ignore the patch then. It just appeared suspicious to me
that the function did exist, but the names assigned were different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/