[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0802111025w4f8d6765w119f9e9c1cddd85e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:25:15 +0900
From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag
Hi David,
In general, I like this feature.
and I found no bug in patch [1/4] and [2/4].
> @@ -218,21 +167,27 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum mempolicy_mode mode,
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> flags &= MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> atomic_set(&policy->refcnt, 1);
> + cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
> + nodes_and(cpuset_context_nmask, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
> switch (mode) {
> case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> - policy->v.nodes = *nodes;
> + if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
need kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy) before return?
> + policy->v.nodes = cpuset_context_nmask;
> if (nodes_weight(policy->v.nodes) == 0) {
> kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> break;
> case MPOL_PREFERRED:
> - policy->v.preferred_node = first_node(*nodes);
> + policy->v.preferred_node = first_node(cpuset_context_nmask);
> if (policy->v.preferred_node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> policy->v.preferred_node = -1;
> break;
> case MPOL_BIND:
> - policy->v.zonelist = bind_zonelist(nodes);
> + if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
ditto
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists