[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080211190317.GA21824@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:03:17 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, bzolnier@...il.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent IDE boot ops on NUMA system in mainline
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:33:14AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Without this patch a Opteron test system here oopses at boot with currentg git.
> >
> > Calling to_pci_dev() on a NULL pointer gives a negative value so the following NULL
> > pointer check never triggers and then an illegal address is referenced. Check the
> > unadjusted original device pointer for NULL instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> >
> > Index: linux/include/linux/ide.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/include/linux/ide.h
> > +++ linux/include/linux/ide.h
> > @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ static inline void ide_dump_identify(u8
> > static inline int hwif_to_node(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(hwif->dev);
> > - return dev ? pcibus_to_node(dev->bus) : -1;
> > + return hwif->dev ? pcibus_to_node(dev->bus) : -1;
> > }
>
> Ok, I applied this, but it causes a *lot* of noise about "unused variable
> 'dev'" because pcibus_to_node() is defined to be -1 when you don't do any
> strange NUMA thing (so that "dev->bus" usage thing is never even seen by
> the compiler.
>
> So we should probably make pcibus_to_node() be an inline function for that
> case, or just make that thing be
>
> return hwif->dev ?
> pcibus_to_node(to_pci_dev(hwif->dev)->bus)
> :
> -1;
>
> or something. Because now things are really noisy.
Yes sorry; I only checked NUMA builds before sending it off.
The easiest way is probably just the traditional (void) cast
I fixed most of the topology macros while I was at it.
-Andi
---
Make topology fallback macros reference their arguments.
This avoids warnings with unreferenced variables in the !NUMA case.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Index: linux/include/asm-generic/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-generic/topology.h
+++ linux/include/asm-generic/topology.h
@@ -30,19 +30,19 @@
/* Other architectures wishing to use this simple topology API should fill
in the below functions as appropriate in their own <asm/topology.h> file. */
#ifndef cpu_to_node
-#define cpu_to_node(cpu) (0)
+#define cpu_to_node(cpu) ((void)(cpu),0)
#endif
#ifndef parent_node
-#define parent_node(node) (0)
+#define parent_node(node) ((void)(node),0)
#endif
#ifndef node_to_cpumask
-#define node_to_cpumask(node) (cpu_online_map)
+#define node_to_cpumask(node) ((void)node, cpu_online_map)
#endif
#ifndef node_to_first_cpu
-#define node_to_first_cpu(node) (0)
+#define node_to_first_cpu(node) ((void)(node),0)
#endif
#ifndef pcibus_to_node
-#define pcibus_to_node(node) (-1)
+#define pcibus_to_node(bus) ((void)(bus), -1)
#endif
#ifndef pcibus_to_cpumask
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists