linux-kernel - Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080211184224.GJ11671@shadowen.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:42:24 +0000
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
Cc:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?)

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:58:08PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> OK, but the return type doesn't have to be in the patched line, it could be in
> a synchronization line or even missing if the function has a long multi-line argument
> list.

Ok, I guess thats fair criticism.  Could you check out the current
checkpatch-next (0.14-8-g3737366 or later -9, -10 etc), and see if
that works.  It seems to on the simple examples you sent me :).

Thanks.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/