[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802111122270.1671@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:25:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The mempolicy mode constants, MPOL_DEFAULT, MPOL_PREFERRED, MPOL_BIND,
> > and MPOL_INTERLEAVE, are better declared as part of an enum for type
> > checking.
>
> What type checking? There is none in standard C for enums.
>
"Type checking" probably isn't the best description for it. As I
mentioned in the changelog for the second patch in this series, a function
with a formal type of 'enum mempolicy_mode' indicates that the optional
mode flags have already been stripped off and the only possible values are
those of 'enum mempolicy_mode'. The implementation will not need to use
mpol_mode() in conditionals or switch statements. I think it's a clean
way of describing what is acting on modes and what is acting on flags.
Functions with a formal type of an 'int' contain both the mode and flags.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists