linux-kernel - Re: [patch 4/4] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080211081053.446a4152.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:10:53 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:30:35 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes wrote:

> Updates Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt and
> Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt to describe optional mempolicy mode
> flags.
> 
> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt     |   11 ++++++++
>  Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> --- a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
> @@ -135,9 +135,11 @@ most general to most specific:
>  
>  Components of Memory Policies
>  
> -    A Linux memory policy is a tuple consisting of a "mode" and an optional set
> -    of nodes.  The mode determine the behavior of the policy, while the
> -    optional set of nodes can be viewed as the arguments to the behavior.
> +    A Linux memory policy consists of a "mode", optional mode flags, and an
> +    optional set of nodes.  The mode determine the behavior of the policy,

                                        determines

> +    the optional mode flags determine the behavior of the mode, and the
> +    optional set of nodes can be viewed as the arguments to the policy
> +    behavior.
>  
>     Internally, memory policies are implemented by a reference counted
>     structure, struct mempolicy.  Details of this structure will be discussed
> @@ -145,7 +147,12 @@ Components of Memory Policies
>  
>  	Note:  in some functions AND in the struct mempolicy itself, the mode
>  	is called "policy".  However, to avoid confusion with the policy tuple,
> -	this document will continue to use the term "mode".
> +	this document will continue to use the term "mode".  Since the mode and
> +	optional mode flags are stored in the same struct mempolicy member
> +	(specifically, pol->policy), you must use mpol_mode(pol->policy) to
> +	access only the mode and mpol_flags(pol->policy) to access only the
> +	flags.  Any function with a formal of type enum mempolicy_mode only
> +	refers to the mode.
>  
>     Linux memory policy supports the following 4 behavioral modes:
>  
> @@ -231,6 +238,28 @@ Components of Memory Policies
>  	    the temporary interleaved system default policy works in this
>  	    mode.
>  
> +   Linux memory policy supports the following optional mode flag:
> +
> +	MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES:  This flag specifies that the nodemask passed by
> +	the user should not be remapped if the task or VMA's set of accessible
> +	nodes changes after the memory policy has been defined.
> +
> +	    Without this flag, anytime a mempolicy is rebound because of a
> +	    change in the set of accessible nodes, the node (Preferred) or
> +	    nodemask (Bind, Interleave) is remapped to the new set of
> +	    accessible nodes.  This may result in nodes being used that were
> +	    previously undesired.  With this flag, the policy is either
> +	    effected over the user's specified nodemask or the Default
> +	    behavior is used.
> +
> +	    For example, consider a task that is attached to a cpuset with
> +	    mems 1-3 that sets an Interleave policy over the same set.  If
> +	    the cpuset's mems change to 3-5, the Interleave will now occur
> +	    over nodes 3, 4, and 5.  With this flag, however, since only
> +	    node 3 is accessible from the user's nodemask, the "interleave"
> +	    only occurs over that node.  If no nodes from the user's
> +	    nodemask are now accessible, the Default behavior is used.
> +
>  MEMORY POLICY APIs
>  
>  Linux supports 3 system calls for controlling memory policy.  These APIS
> @@ -251,7 +280,9 @@ Set [Task] Memory Policy:
>  	Set's the calling task's "task/process memory policy" to mode
>  	specified by the 'mode' argument and the set of nodes defined
>  	by 'nmask'.  'nmask' points to a bit mask of node ids containing
> -	at least 'maxnode' ids.
> +	at least 'maxnode' ids.  Optional mode flags may be passed by
> +	intersecting the 'mode' argument with the flag (for example:

        or combining ?  I'm used to intersection being more of an
	and-op instead of an or-op, but maybe I'm missing something.

> +	MPOL_INTERLEAVE | MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES).
>  
>  	See the set_mempolicy(2) man page for more details

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/