[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080211202007.GC25262@josefsipek.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:20:07 -0500
From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@...efsipek.net>
To: Nur Hussein <nurhussein@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Taint kernel after WARN_ON(condition)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:52:22AM +0800, Nur Hussein wrote:
> This patch will taint the kernel with a new flag, 'W', whenever a
> warning is issued with WARN_ON(condition). Whenever a warning occurs, it
> is helpful to record this within the kernel state as a taint. When a BUG
> happens, it'd be useful to know if it was also preceded by a WARN.
Any architecture that has it's own WARN_ON will not taint the kernel.
Speaking of WARN_ON...
$ git-grep "[^A-Za-z_0-9]WARN_ON(1)" | wc -l
180
Maybe making a WARN() (similar to BUG) that does an unconditional warning
(and sets the taint flag) and having a simple wrapper around it for the
conditional WARN_ON would be worth it? Hm...looks like some of the USB folks
have a #define'd WARN to something quite a bit more complex (format string,
etc.)
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
Linux, n.:
Generous programmers from around the world all join forces to help
you shoot yourself in the foot for free.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists