[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802121220.51755.ak@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:51 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [5/8] Fix logic error in 64bit memory hotadd
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 11:35:22 Yasunori Goto wrote:
> Hi Ingo-san.
>
> > > Does anyone even
> > > use memory hotplug currently?
> >
> > I don't know.
>
> IBM's powerpc box can memory hot-add/remove by dynamic partitioning.
> And our fujitsu server has memory hot-add feature (Ia-64).
> So, they are concrete user of memory hotplug.
>
> In x86, E8500 chipset has the feature of memory-hotplug.
> (I searched a data-sheet from intel site.)
> http://download.intel.com/design/chipsets/e8500/datashts/30674501.pdf
> (6.3.8 IMI Hot-Plug)
>
> So, it depends on how many server uses it, I think.
With the logic pud error i found and that seems currently will stay
for the forseeable future in the tree I don't think x86-64 64bit hotadds for more
than 1GB have ever worked with the sparsemem method.
Older trees (before 2.6.24) had also a different method that did
preallocate everything based on the SRAT. That one should have worked
for this case.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists