[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080212220916.B1EC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:57 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3
Hi
> > please ack.
>
> As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
> such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus
Thanks, really thanks.
> Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x? If so, the reasons for such a
> relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
> -stable maintiners to evaluate.
Oh,
you think below reason is not enough, really?
1. it is regression.
2. it is very easy reprodusable on memoryless node machine.
if so, i back down on my backport reclaim.
I don't hope increase your headache ;-)
thanks.
-kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists