linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:57 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

Hi

> > please ack.
> 
> As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
> such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus

Thanks, really thanks.


> Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x?  If so, the reasons for such a
> relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
> -stable maintiners to evaluate.

Oh,
you think below reason is not enough, really?

1. it is regression.
2. it is very easy reprodusable on memoryless node machine.


if so, i back down on my backport reclaim.
I don't hope increase your headache ;-)

thanks.

-kosaki


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/