[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:36:24 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: arjan@...radead.org, greg@...ah.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
David Miller wrote:
> This is why, with the networking, we've just tossed all of the network
> driver stuff in there too. I can rebase freely, remove changesets,
> rework them, etc. and this causes a very low amount of pain for Jeff
> Garzik and John Linville.
s/very low/not low/
Rebasing is always a pain, and John and I both agreed the other day that
you do it too often.
I've complained about this before, too... but figured this was just
another thing I was getting ignored on, and so life moved on. But don't
try to sell rebasing as "low pain".
Rebasing makes the history all nice and pretty, but by totalling
flattening the history, trashing all the commit ids (and rewriting
associated metadata), you create obvious downstream problems.
Rebasing is low impact only if you don't have git downstream people.
Otherwise, you're just treating it as a useful quilt clone, really.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists