linux-kernel - Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47B1CD75.6070505@panasas.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:46:45 +0200
From:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, arjan@...radead.org,
	greg@...ah.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

On Feb. 12, 2008, 18:36 +0200, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> This is why, with the networking, we've just tossed all of the network
>> driver stuff in there too.  I can rebase freely, remove changesets,
>> rework them, etc. and this causes a very low amount of pain for Jeff
>> Garzik and John Linville.
> 
> 
> s/very low/not low/
> 
> Rebasing is always a pain, and John and I both agreed the other day that 
> you do it too often.
> 
> I've complained about this before, too...  but figured this was just 
> another thing I was getting ignored on, and so life moved on.  But don't 
> try to sell rebasing as "low pain".
> 
> Rebasing makes the history all nice and pretty, but by totalling 
> flattening the history, trashing all the commit ids (and rewriting 
> associated metadata), you create obvious downstream problems.

FWIW, when I rebase branches in my tree that others depend on
I keep tags on the old heads for reference.  Once the work-in-progress
is done (e.g. tree pulled upstream) the reference tags can be cleaned
up and the tree can be pruned.

Benny

> 
> Rebasing is  low impact only if you don't have git downstream people. 
> Otherwise, you're just treating it as a useful quilt clone, really.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/