[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080212175015.GA2001@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:50:15 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Cc: Matthew Keenan <matt@...ode-solutions.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22.18
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:48:42PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Greg KH:
>
> > the logic is a little different in 2.6.22 and earlier in regards to this
> > area of code. This way we are safer.
>
> Your patch doesn't include the CVE-2006-0010 hunk. Is this because
> get_user() implies an access_ok() check (while __copy_from_user()
> obviously does not)?
Yes, that is exactly why. CVE-2006-0010 and -0009 are not applicable to
kernels prior to 2.6.23.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists