[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B1EA0E.7080602@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:48:46 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, arjan@...radead.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Greg KH wrote:
> A lot of time that already happens today, between the different
> subsystem maintainers. We routinely pass PCI and driver core changes
> through the network and scsi and ata trees in order to handle merge
> issues properly. This already happened in a few places in the
> 2.6.25-rc1 merge cycle.
Yep. I do that with the powerpc tree sometimes, too: I'll ACK a
drivers/net change that is obviously PPC-specific, and that drivers/net
change will go in via paulus.
Like you said, it's done on a per-patch not git tree basis at the moment.
That sort of cooperation has become common: in areas of shared
responsibility, request an ack, and then the "most obvious" person
(generally the one with most merge dependencies) merges that
shared-responsibility change along with some other changes specific to
their own tree.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists