[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080212193655.GA2771@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:36:55 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: vmsplice exploits, stack protector and Makefiles
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:08:18AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:50:12 +0100
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Now I realize that certain distros have patched gcc to compensate
> > > for their lack of distro wide CFLAGS, and it's great to work around
> > > that... but would there be a way to NOT disable this for
> > > CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR please? It would have made this exploit
> > > not possible for those kernels that enable this feature (and that
> > > includes distros like Fedora)
> >
> > I guess the problem is that we in arch/x86/Makefile enable the
> > stackprotector but then later in the main Makefile disables it.
> > So the right way to approach this should be to always disable it and
> > the reenable it in the arch Makefile.
> > So something like this?
>
>
> the patch works fine for me.
> Linus, can we please get this merged into .25? it will at least
> again limit the damage exploits like the vmsplice one can do..
>
> (I think it's also worth it for -stable)
I will prepare it for my next -fix round. Due in a few days.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists