lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:02:41 -0800
From:	Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>
To:	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: graphics probing messages: questions

Maybe this should go to a more specific list, but I had
a question about a dmesg v. Kconfig item.

One option under graphics asks about enabling firmware EDID
and says should be safe.  So it's 'yes'

Further down under nVidia FB Support, there is an option
"Enable DDC Support" which tries to use i2c for getting
EDID info and I should say 'Y'.

With those on, in dmesg, I get:
i2c-adapter i2c-0: unable to read EDID block.
i2c-adapter i2c-0: unable to read EDID block.
i2c-adapter i2c-0: unable to read EDID block.
i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block.
i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block.
i2c-adapter i2c-1: unable to read EDID block.
Followed by:
nvidiafb: CRTC 0 appears to have a CRT attached
nvidiafb: Using CRT on CRTC 0
mtrr: base(0xd0000000) is not aligned on a size(0x20000000) boundary
nvidiafb: unable to setup MTRR
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30
nvidiafb: PCI nVidia NV9 framebuffer (64MB @ 0xD0000000)
vesafb: cannot reserve video memory at 0xd0000000
vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd0000000, mapped to 0xffffc20015200000, using 
3072k, total 262144k
vesafb: mode is 1024x768x16, linelength=2048, pages=1
vesafb: scrolling: redraw
vesafb: Truecolor: size=0:5:6:5, shift=0:11:5:0
fb1: VESA VGA frame buffer device
----
    So this means turning "DCC Support" is useless on this machine?
    Also, why can't the graphics drivers use a base that is
not aligned on a 0x20000000 boundary?  Is this a machine design flaw,
or some limitation in the software?

Thanks muchly,
Linda

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ