linux-kernel - Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802122116400.7699@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, James Bottomley wrote:

> >  Rebases *do*not*work* (and fundamentally cannot work) in a 
> > distributed environment.
> Hm ... I think net is a counter example to this.  Rebases certainly work
> for them.  The issue, I thought, was around the policy of rebasing and
> how often.

Hmm ... as far as I can see, Jeff and John (i.e. net tree downstreams) are 
pretty loudly unhappy with Dave rebasing too often, right?

-- 
Jiri Kosina

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/