linux-kernel - Re: currently active Linux kernel versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wsp9q3ev.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:48 +0100
From:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To:	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wferi@...f.hu
Subject: Re: currently active Linux kernel versions

Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr> writes:

> On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> 
>> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
>> time?  The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
>> Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for
>> a more or less critical server, those that have active security
>> support or receive at least critical bugfixes?  I know about the
>> 2.6.2[34].y stable git trees, but I wonder how long will those receive
>> attention (that is, security fixes).  Can I find a written policy
>> somewhere?
>
> The answer is at http://kernel.org/

Not quite, at least I can't find 2.6.23.y there, even though that
branch seems to be maintained...
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/