[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080211185115.87e878d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:51:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
Cc: greg@...ah.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: check msr to get mmconfig for amd family
10h opteron v3
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:20:46 -0800 Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 05:09:44 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:48:35 -0800
> > Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
> > >
> > > so even booting kernel with acpi=off or even MCFG is not there, we still can
> > > use MMCONFIG.
> > >
> >
> > This patch threw a big reject. I didn't check why.
> >
> >
> > > + pci_direct_conf1.read(0, bus, devfn, 0, 4, &l);
> >
> > When I fixed the reject, compilation failed here.
> >
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c: In function 'pci_mmcfg_check_hostbridge':
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:214: error: 'pci_direct_conf1' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >
> >
> > What kernel are you patching?
> >
>
> linus tree.
hm. So why didn't it compile? pci_direct_conf1 is defined over in
arch/x86/pci/direct.c and is not mentioned in any header file.
> other three are ok?
Well, they applied, but I didn't review, build-test or merge them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists