[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B22202.4070702@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:47:30 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ananth@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL?] Create and populate toplevel tests/ for kernel tests
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Linus.
>
> Will you consider such a primary code-movement for -rc1
> or shall we wait until next merge window?
>
> Had we hit -rc2 I would not have sent this pull req and
> feel free to flame me anyway.
>
> The rationale to get it merged is obviously to avoid
> merge conflicts and the only reason I ask is that I consider
> it a low risk patch.
>
> I have not included 8/8 since it was questioned and it
> will wait until next merge window. But the first 7 was
> straightforward.
>
> You can pull from:
> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/tests.git
>
> diffstat and shortlog below.
> I also included mail last with a few of the merge related comments.
>
> Sam
>
> Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 -
> kernel/Makefile | 4 -
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 71 +--------------------
> lib/Makefile | 1 -
> tests/Kconfig | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++
we could make it even lower risk and not move the Kconfig now.
Moving the Kconfig is fine for .26; it doesn't really impact anything else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists