| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:35:57 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: chris.mason@...cle.com Cc: jengelh@...putergmbh.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@....oracle.com Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage... From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:35:20 -0500 > From my point of view, 0 is a bad idea because it is very likely to > conflict with other things. Starting at 0 is a bad idea because otherwise you'll waste significant chunks of your disk on Sparc because of reasons I've outlined in other replies. What XFS does is really unfortunate, let's learn from it's mistake. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists