[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802130032190.14275@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:39:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage...
On Feb 12 2008 15:26, David Miller wrote:
>
>> (Yes, I had xfs on sparc before, so it's not like you NEED the
>> whitespace at the start of a partition.)
>
>You actully do unless you want to lose significant chunks of your disk
>space.
>
>The Sun disk label only allows you to specify the start of a partition
>in cylinders, so if you want to use a filesystem like XFS you have to
>start the partition on cylinder 1 which can be many blocks into the
>disk. That entire first cylinder is completely wasted.
Ok you do have a point there. The GPT users win of course, since it
uses LBA, not cyls, so the number of lost bytes is generally below
a cyl.
On the other hand, the H and S of CHS could be lowered and S increased,
e.g. divide H by 2, divide S by 2, multiply S by 4. This gives a finer
bytes/cylinder granularity.
>What XFS does by putting the superblock at zero is simply does not
>take these kinds of issues into consideration.
>
Well it was designed for a different system initially with
a different style of booting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists