[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080211210724.eec5421d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:07:24 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict
nodemask to allowed nodes V3
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:30:22 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> # this is second post of the same patch.
>
> this is backport from -mm to mainline.
> original patch is http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120250000001182&w=2
>
> my change is only line number change and remove extra space.
This is identical to what I have now.
> please ack.
As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus
Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x? If so, the reasons for such a
relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
-stable maintiners to evaluate.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists