[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k5l9pb7d.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:28:06 +0100
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: currently active Linux kernel versions
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> writes:
> I would suggest stable - N-1 for most usages. 2.6.24.y is open, 2.6.23.y is
> supposed to be good. The advantage when you proceed like this is that you
> can jump from an older kernel to a more recent one which has already got its
> share of fixes and is still maintained for some time.
>
> Generally, I would trust Greg when he drops an old kernel, it means that he's
> confident enough in the next one.
Thanks for the useful (and concise) summary and sharing your thoughts
on the matter. Now my only question is: how can I learn that Greg
updated or dropped a kernel without following LKML (which my time
unfortunately does not permit). kernel-announce doesn't seem to
mention such events...
--
Regards,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists