linux-kernel - Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:40:32 +0800
From:	"Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@...il.com>
To:	"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	"Scott Lovenberg" <scott.lovenberg@...il.com>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	"Mulyadi Santosa" <mulyadi.santosa@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

On 2/13/08, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi all...
> >>>
> >>> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
> >>> documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
> >>> kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it.
> >>> Feedback?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Adrian is no longer the trivial patch maintainer.
> >> Did you send the patch to trivial@...nel.org ?
> >>
> >> Any doc additions or improvements would be appreciated.
> >> I'll be glad to help get them merged...
> >>
> >> ---
> >> ~Randy
> >>
> >>
> > I'd love to help, but I'm a bit of a newbie; what's protocol for
> > documentation updates, standard diffs?
>
> Yes.
>
> > How are we going to attack this thing, cleaning up and updating existing
> > documentation first and then adding undocumented items, or file by file
> > updating and adding in one fell swoop?
>
> File by file.
>
> And please place the new documentation of sysfs and procfs entries into
> the framework in the Documentation/ABI/ directory tree, which is where
> it belongs.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

some questions:

a.   the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing
file via "procname" search.....not sure if it is correct (as per
attached, complete?)

b.   what is the diff between /proc and /sys?   in
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt....it is mentioned that /proc
information will be published into a book...where is it?   I can never
understand this.

c.   in Doc/sysctl are all the explanation for /proc/sys/* .... as a
start i think we shall contribute fixing here....but according to your
email, we should fix Doc/ABI...so I supposed some migration is needed?

d.   In networking/ip-sysctl.txt a lot of the explanation for the
attached procname's parameters are explained, may be we can relocate
it to ABI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/